Please read before posting
Please post on this blog any issues regarding our property or your particular units.
This blog has been set up with the intention of giving anyone at Woodbrooke Estates a chance to bring up any issues they may encounter and to give a chance to the property management company to resolve them in a timely and professional manner.
This blog is not in anyways related to the Property Management Company of YCC 244 (PMC) , nor to the Board of Directors (BOD).Both PMC and BOD are welcome to check the blog frequently (maybe on daily basis), to take note of the issues, to post replies or to make announcements for the residents.
This blog is not monitored so PLEASE do not post unappropriate materials. Also please take in account no one controls the security of this blog so please DO NOT POST CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ON THIS BLOG.The access to this blog is public (i.e. not secured) so it can be accessed,or one can post material from anywhere where there is an internet connection by typing
http://www.ycc244.blogspot.com/ in the browser.
The content of any posted material will solely represent its poster's opinion.
Use it responsibly so we may increase the value of our property!
To post a new message on this blog as a new topic send an email with your message to
-- this feature currently disable for avoiding spam posts ---
Enjoy!
There is a serious issue to be dealt with by the board . the Lawyer clearly stated at the meeting that the law is the law...in essence he is saying that Nancy is breaking the law by remaining on the board....If this board sits and has Nancy on the board they will be breaking the Law as she is " by law " no longer a member of the board. This a dilemma for Bob,Dan,Seamus,and Mona. If you allow Nancy to take part in any meeting as a sitting member all of you are breaking the law.
ReplyDeletePlease have Management arrange a meeting with the NEW board and discuss the problem ..He seemed very evasive last night and did not want to openly answer the question....I believe he should have, and he seemed to be avoiding it ...Why??? Are we back to the begining again...Just a thought...If this board sits and knowing breaks the Law ...( and the lawyer said the law is the law )and this matter should esclate to the courts only those who oppose Nancy's being on the board would be covered under the Corp. lawyer all others would have to pay for there own lawyer and may possibley be removed by the courts for doing so.. Please people ...solve this quickly...obey the law and consult the Lawyer and get a quick straight forward answer..
Very concerened
Hi all
ReplyDeleteThe 5th position of our board of directors needs to be address
Nancy volunteers her time for the community and from the point that was brought up last night, that she was elected to the board by being the next in line of the votes after the previous 2 members quit is interesting. Then in a letter she was address to the community as being Appointed to the board. So what is it? This should have been address by the lawyer last night, but it wasn't. Why are we paying for him to be our lawyer if he doesn't answer our questions regarding board member issues? Is that part of his job or not?
If the board position of Nancy was elected then fine, if she was appointed by the board then that position is now open.
I only see this as a deadlock with the board dealing directly with this. If this is the case, another election is in the making.
Was Dan elected by TAFT?
ReplyDeleteThe result for Dan Hu, Sai bei Fang and Jing guo Sun was doubtful. These three were in the same flyer. How many of you owners gave your proxy to them.
Think about TAFT's registration and election prosedure at our AGM.
Doubtful!!!!!
WOULD SOMEONE PLEASE START A NEW BLOG AND HAVE AS MANY PEOPLE REGISTER AT THE FOLLOWING ADDRESS THIS IS EXTERMELY IMPORTANT BECAUSE THEY ARE HIDING BEHIND THE LAW BECAUSE THE CORP. LAWYER DID NOT AND WOULD NOT TELL THEM THAT THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW. THEY ARE HIDING BEHIND BEHIND THIS BECAUSE OUR LAWYER DID NOT TELL THEM THAT THEY WERE BREAKING THE LAW. THEY ARE SITTING LAUGHING AT YOU BECAUSE OF THIS... A COLLECTION AND BANK ACCOUNT SHOULD BE OPENED AND A COMMITTE SHOULD BE FORMED TO PROTECT US OUR LAWYER AND SOME MEMBERS OF THIS BOARD ARE NOT DOING THIS
ReplyDeleteinfo@ontariocondominiumownersassociation.com
PLEASE REGISTER AT THIS SITE IT IS ONE FOR ALL CONDO OWNERS IN ONTARIO NO COST ..JUST A SHORT FORM ... AND THAT IS ALL..
THESE PEOPLE CLAIMING NOT TO KNOW THE LAW AND ARE HIDING BEHIND THIS EVEN AFTER THE PORTION OF THE ACT WAS SENT TO ALL PEOPLE ON THE BOARD INCLUDING MANAGEMENT AND THE LAWYER..
tHIS IS WHAT WE HAVE AGAIN PEOPLE WHO ARE IGNORING THE LAW AND FLONTING IT IN OUR FACES BY CONTINUEINE TO IGNORE IT.
I DON'T KNOW HOW TO START A NEW BLOG WOULD SOMEONE START ONE AND COPY AND PASTE THIS TO IT THE BLOG COULD BE...THERE IS NO IGNORANCE OF THE LAW THEY HAVE BEEN TOLD.
THANK YOU PLEASE HELP TAKE BACK OUR COMMUNITY FROM UNSCRUPULOUS PEOPLE AND HAVE THE ILLEAGLE PERSON REMOVED AND A VOTE TAKE PLACE THEY CAN RUN AGAIN IF SHE IS NOT AFRAID TO FACE THE COMMUNITY WHY ARE THEY HIDING BEHIND IGNORANCE OF THE LAW. THEY AHD THE OLD BOARD ,DAN BOB AND NANCY KNOW THE LAW..
THANKING YOU IN ADVANCE FOR YOU CONCERNS OF OUR COMMUNITY ...PLEASE TAKE IT BACK...-
Does anyone know Steve well enough to go to him for help in this matter???? (unit 71) if anyone can help remove this(these) person
ReplyDelete(s) that are openly breaking the law and laughing at us he can. If you people are truley interested in having an HONEST BOARD please voice your opinion..
There were no winners only losers and they are this community. the previous board (Catherines) broke the law on numerous occasions and we are worst off because of it. And now a board with Nancy, bob, and Dan have openly broken the law and have told you they don't care. When things go wrong we have no one to blame only ourselves for what happens. Many of us came from countries where we were oppresed and had no say in what went on, here we have these rights given to us and we do nothing to protect them. We came here from different cultures and different backgrounds to a place where we can have a say in what happens, yet we sit here and DO NOTHING while someone breaks the law in our own community where we CAN and SHOULD do something yet we do nothing. SHAME ON US!! What will they do next? A committe should be formed to take back our rights and force those who (BOB, DAN AND NANCY)who have openly defied the law.
ReplyDeleteASHAMED
34. (1) If a vacancy arises in the board, the remaining directors may exercise all the powers of the board as long as a quorum of the board remains in office. 1998, c. 19, s. 34 (1).(Condominium Act,1998. PART IV CORPORATION,DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS, 34. Vacancy. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from
ReplyDeletehttp://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_98c19_e.htm#BK43)
why it is so difficult to follow the law? if she wants to be in the board again, she can ask owner to voter for her. everyone will appreciate that she is willing to volunteer her time to be on the board. but why don't just simply follow the law? if the law is not been followed, so where is the trust?
"Replacement made by board
ReplyDelete(2) If a vacancy arises in the board and a quorum of the board remains in office, the majority of the remaining members of the board may appoint any person qualified to be a member of the board to fill the vacancy until the next annual general meeting. 1998, c. 19, s. 34 (2)."(Condominium Act,1998. PART IV CORPORATION,DIRECTORS AND OFFICERS, 34. Vacancy. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from
http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_98c19_e.htm#BK43)