Please post on this blog any issues regarding our property or your particular units.
This blog has been set up with the intention of giving anyone at Woodbrooke Estates a chance to bring up any issues they may encounter and to give a chance to the property management company to resolve them in a timely and professional manner.
This blog is not in anyways related to the Property Management Company of YCC 244 (PMC) , nor to the Board of Directors (BOD).Both PMC and BOD are welcome to check the blog frequently (maybe on daily basis), to take note of the issues, to post replies or to make announcements for the residents.
This blog is not monitored so PLEASE do not post unappropriate materials. Also please take in account no one controls the security of this blog so please DO NOT POST CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION ON THIS BLOG.The access to this blog is public (i.e. not secured) so it can be accessed,or one can post material from anywhere where there is an internet connection by typing http://www.ycc244.blogspot.com/ in the browser.
The content of any posted material will solely represent its poster's opinion.
Use it responsibly so we may increase the value of our property!
To post a new message on this blog as a new topic send an email with your message to -- this feature currently disable for avoiding spam posts ---
Enjoy!
Wednesday, November 24, 2010
Hall painting at 20 Moonstone....
It started a couple days before the AGM but it looks like they don't do anything anymore.... (this is for the ground floor). Anybody seen those folks working in some other building(s)???
Has anyone heard when or if we will have an election to replace Nancy? It was clear at the meeting that she should not be there. Did the board conspire to do this? If so,Why?
Why are you so anxious to remove Nancy from the Board? She has dedicated her time for us other owners and she has done nothing wrong. I wonder what your motive is .
First let me tell you when the time comes for Nancy to be legally voted onto the board I will be voting for her. Why they have insisted on doing what they are by attempting to keep her on the board when they know it is against the law,but I am willing to forgive them for attempting it. I do not know how long you have lived here but if you remember Catherine's board (on which Dan sat ) the ACT was not followed and was broken many times. This board esp. the three remaining sitting board members know whay went on Bob resigned from that board.
We wanted a safe, HONEST board at the previous AGM that is what we voted for.
What many people do not realize that if Nancy continues to sit on this board with out being voted there we the owners could suffer from this. Should anyone take this to court over their actions the court could appoint an administrator to look after our affairs and we would have very little to say about it, and a board could be appointed to sit and have very little to say of what goes on here until the courts think we can manage our own affairs. They could look into our finances and say we do not have enough money in our reserve fund and either raise our maint. fees our call for a special assesment to top them up. This has happened in other places we do not need that here. No one wants this. So in the face of this why would they insist in knowingly break the law and possibly cause this to happen? Did they hope no one would say anything? We have seen many improvements since this board was installed in 2009. Why would we want to throw this away because they are breaking the law are they affraid of something ? So my answer is not to remove Nancy from the board because she legally is not on the board but to follow the ACT as it should be and not take a step backward. If Nancy really wants to help this place, as a former board member she should run for the position again,and the new board must call for a vote and I am sure the people after listening to Seamus" rambling, shouting and interupting the meeting, not abiding by the rules, would not give anyone he would promote their vote. I have faith in the people of our community not to allow another group of people such as we had before in Catherine and her group try and dominate this place as they once did! If you believe in following the Condo Act and not want it to be broken, have honest people looking after our affairs why would you want someone to illegally stay on the board? If they insisted on illegally staying what would that tell you about them and yourself for that matter? Have a vote and put her back on the board legally.
Thanks for explaining in detail the reason the urgency to have Nancy resign /removed from sitting on the Board. Sorry, I had posted my comment under the wrong heading (re: Hall painting). Has anyone actually spoken directly to the other members of the Board and pointed out to them the consequenses if Nancy remains?
I found it for you and hopefully it will not dissapear this time....
First let me tell you when the time comes for Nancy to be legally voted onto the board I will be voting for her. Why they have insisted on doing what they are by attempting to keep her on the board when they know it is against the law,but I am willing to forgive them for attempting it. I do not know how long you have lived here but if you remember Catherine's board (on which Dan sat ) the ACT was not followed and was broken many times. This board esp. the three remaining sitting board members know whay went on Bob resigned from that board.
We wanted a safe, HONEST board at the previous AGM that is what we voted for.
What many people do not realize that if Nancy continues to sit on this board with out being voted there we the owners could suffer from this. Should anyone take this to court over their actions the court could appoint an administrator to look after our affairs and we would have very little to say about it, and a board could be appointed to sit and have very little to say of what goes on here until the courts think we can manage our own affairs. They could look into our finances and say we do not have enough money in our reserve fund and either raise our maint. fees our call for a special assesment to top them up. This has happened in other places we do not need that here. No one wants this. So in the face of this why would they insist in knowingly break the law and possibly cause this to happen? Did they hope no one would say anything? We have seen many improvements since this board was installed in 2009. Why would we want to throw this away because they are breaking the law are they affraid of something ? So my answer is not to remove Nancy from the board because she legally is not on the board but to follow the ACT as it should be and not take a step backward. If Nancy really wants to help this place, as a former board member she should run for the position again,and the new board must call for a vote and I am sure the people after listening to Seamus" rambling, shouting and interupting the meeting, not abiding by the rules, would not give anyone he would promote their vote. I have faith in the people of our community not to allow another group of people such as we had before in Catherine and her group try and dominate this place as they once did! If you believe in following the Condo Act and not want it to be broken, have honest people looking after our affairs why would you want someone to illegally stay on the board? If they insisted on illegally staying what would that tell you about them and yourself for that matter? Have a vote and put her back on the board legally.
Since not to many people read this blog maybe someone should mail this to all residents so they all understand what this means to everyone here... anyone willing???
THIS IS CANADA !!!! ENGLISH is the language of this country . Lucky you to get into this country not being able to speak ENGLISH. There are free classes for you to learn ENGLLISH . So , make the effort. PLEASE
I'm sure that many of our residents have taken ESL, But there older ones that because of their age when they came here still have a problem with English . the Boards past and present have sent out information in English and Chinese to help bridge this gap. I personally see no problem in this it helps bridge a gap between us and keeps everyone informed, in communications from the Board it also states to check the English. We have a very diverse community here and now is not the time to try and divide it. May be what the person is trying to say , if someone could translate the above comments and have it either posted here along with the English version or, print especially the above comments and have them sent to the owners in English and Chinese this would inform ALL people of the potential problem that the old board has created, and at the same time inform them all of this blog so we can all participate in our community and stop these things from happening again. Most people I believe would agree to this but there may be some that would not agree.
Put this blog address in everyones mail box and tell your neighbours about this blog if you care. Then maybe things like this attempted deception will not happen again.
2 in "C" building..Strange isn't such a rush before the meeting and now???? OH .different day same stuff.. Maybe finished now by Christmes??
ReplyDeleteHas anyone heard when or if we will have an election to replace Nancy? It was clear at the meeting that she should not be there. Did the board conspire to do this? If so,Why?
ReplyDeleteWhy are you so anxious to remove Nancy from the Board? She has dedicated her time for us other owners and she has done nothing wrong. I wonder what your motive is .
ReplyDeleteFirst let me tell you when the time comes for Nancy to be legally voted onto the board I will be voting for her. Why they have insisted on doing what they are by attempting to keep her on the board when they know it is against the law,but I am willing to forgive them for attempting it.
ReplyDeleteI do not know how long you have lived here but if you remember Catherine's board (on which Dan sat ) the ACT was not followed and was broken many times. This board esp. the three remaining sitting board members know whay went on Bob resigned from that board.
We wanted a safe, HONEST board at the previous AGM that is what we voted for.
What many people do not realize that if Nancy continues to sit on this board with out being voted there we the owners could suffer from this. Should anyone take this to court over their actions the court could appoint an administrator to look after our affairs and we would have very little to say about it, and a board could be appointed to sit and have very little to say of what goes on here until the courts think we can manage our own affairs.
They could look into our finances and say we do not have enough money in our reserve fund and either raise our maint. fees our call for a special assesment to top them up. This has happened in other places we do not need that here.
No one wants this. So in the face of this why would they insist in knowingly break the law and possibly cause this to happen? Did they hope no one would say anything?
We have seen many improvements since this board was installed in 2009. Why would we want to throw this away because they are breaking the law are they affraid of something ?
So my answer is not to remove Nancy from the board because she legally is not on the board but to follow the ACT as it should be and not take a step backward. If Nancy really wants to help this place, as a former board member she should run for the position again,and the new board must call for a vote and I am sure the people after listening to Seamus" rambling, shouting and interupting the meeting, not abiding by the rules, would not give anyone he would promote their vote. I have faith in the people of our community not to allow another group of people such as we had before in Catherine and her group try and dominate this place as they once did!
If you believe in following the Condo Act and not want it to be broken, have honest people looking after our affairs why would you want someone to illegally stay on the board?
If they insisted on illegally staying what would that tell you about them and yourself for that matter?
Have a vote and put her back on the board legally.
Thanks for explaining in detail the reason the urgency to have Nancy resign /removed from sitting on the Board. Sorry, I had posted my comment under the wrong heading (re: Hall painting). Has anyone actually spoken directly to the other members of the Board and pointed out to them the consequenses if Nancy remains?
ReplyDeleteI don't see an answer listed here where is it?? Did someone remove it ???
ReplyDeleteI found it for you and hopefully it will not dissapear this time....
ReplyDeleteFirst let me tell you when the time comes for Nancy to be legally voted onto the board I will be voting for her. Why they have insisted on doing what they are by attempting to keep her on the board when they know it is against the law,but I am willing to forgive them for attempting it.
I do not know how long you have lived here but if you remember Catherine's board (on which Dan sat ) the ACT was not followed and was broken many times. This board esp. the three remaining sitting board members know whay went on Bob resigned from that board.
We wanted a safe, HONEST board at the previous AGM that is what we voted for.
What many people do not realize that if Nancy continues to sit on this board with out being voted there we the owners could suffer from this. Should anyone take this to court over their actions the court could appoint an administrator to look after our affairs and we would have very little to say about it, and a board could be appointed to sit and have very little to say of what goes on here until the courts think we can manage our own affairs.
They could look into our finances and say we do not have enough money in our reserve fund and either raise our maint. fees our call for a special assesment to top them up. This has happened in other places we do not need that here.
No one wants this. So in the face of this why would they insist in knowingly break the law and possibly cause this to happen? Did they hope no one would say anything?
We have seen many improvements since this board was installed in 2009. Why would we want to throw this away because they are breaking the law are they affraid of something ?
So my answer is not to remove Nancy from the board because she legally is not on the board but to follow the ACT as it should be and not take a step backward. If Nancy really wants to help this place, as a former board member she should run for the position again,and the new board must call for a vote and I am sure the people after listening to Seamus" rambling, shouting and interupting the meeting, not abiding by the rules, would not give anyone he would promote their vote. I have faith in the people of our community not to allow another group of people such as we had before in Catherine and her group try and dominate this place as they once did!
If you believe in following the Condo Act and not want it to be broken, have honest people looking after our affairs why would you want someone to illegally stay on the board?
If they insisted on illegally staying what would that tell you about them and yourself for that matter?
Have a vote and put her back on the board legally.
Since not to many people read this blog maybe someone should mail this to all residents so they all understand what this means to everyone here... anyone willing???
ReplyDeleteAnybody know a good translator???
ReplyDeleteEverybody should know about this !!!
THIS IS CANADA !!!! ENGLISH is the language of this country . Lucky you to get into this country not being able to speak ENGLISH. There are free classes for you to learn ENGLLISH . So , make the effort. PLEASE
ReplyDeleteI'm sure that many of our residents have taken ESL, But there older ones that because of their age when they came here still have a problem with English . the Boards past and present have sent out information in English and Chinese to help bridge this gap. I personally see no problem in this it helps bridge a gap between us and keeps everyone informed, in communications from the Board it also states to check the English.
ReplyDeleteWe have a very diverse community here and now is not the time to try and divide it.
May be what the person is trying to say , if someone could translate the above comments and have it either posted here along with the English version or, print especially the above comments and have them sent to the owners in English and Chinese this would inform ALL people of the potential problem that the old board has created, and at the same time inform them all of this blog so we can all participate in our community and stop these things from happening again.
Most people I believe would agree to this but there may be some that would not agree.
Put this blog address in everyones mail box and tell your neighbours about this blog if you care. Then maybe things like this attempted deception will not happen again.